🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like much of federal defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of current options. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a superior and less expensive approach for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation is that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.