🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed decision, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that may create up to five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to lift a district court's block that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its ruling.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters according to their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to use the districts drawn after the 2020 census for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

Through a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action is part of a national fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican hold. Ordinarily, boundary revision happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that are estimated to yield several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party officials lamented the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top Democratic figure argued the court had yet again damaged its legitimacy by upholding a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.